fbpx

Swiss-based semantic search company Hulbee, which launched a consumer search engine in the U.S. this August, has closed a $9 million angel funding.

The investors are not being disclosed beyond the firm saying one is a serial entrepreneur from Switzerland and the other is a business person from Canada.

Hulbee is positioning its consumer search offering as a pro-privacy alternative to mainstream search engines like Google, with a pledge that unlike those guys it does not track users. So it’s competing with other search players in the pro-privacy space, such as DuckDuckGo.

Although, unlike DDG, it has its own (semantic) search tech too — which it’s touting as another differentiator, along with a “clean interface”, and search results supplemented by a word cloud of related themes/content that allow users to narrow their search with a few considered clicks. Hulbee

It also has its own ad system, rather than bolting on a third party ad network. And again here it’s taking a non-tracking approach. Ads on Hulbee are targeted based on the search query, according to CEO Andreas Wiebe, so there’s no geotargeting or cumulative tracking. (Although users can specify their region in order to ensure more relevant search results, so it may have basic country data. And once you step off Hulbee and onto whatever website you were trying to find chances are their ad networks will start tracking you, unless you’re running an ad blocker…)

“Unlike Google’s offering, Hulbee doesn’t fall back on surveillance, so there’s no geotargeting. For Hulbee, the user is completely invisible,” says Wiebe. “Hulbee only focuses on the search query, and definitely doesn’t know where it’s from or who entered it.”

“The fundamental idea… is to win over consumers who prioritize ownership of their data. We recognize that most consumers do not want to be tracked,” he adds.

Such a partial view of the user does not lend itself to highly targeted ‘interest-based advertising’ — so Hulbee is also focusing on touting a brand-building proposition to advertisers (hence the Coca-Cola graphic in the word cloud, above right).

“Unlike traditional search engines, we don’t focus on highly focused targeting, but instead specialize in ‘mass informing’ of our visitors, including image, brand name, event advertising. Thus, we obviously will be interested, for example, in global companies launching a new brand or product, such as the film industry promoting the new movies or an event tie-in,” says Wiebe.

“We’re dealing with fairly sophisticated visitors. Although we do not track and don’t ‘know’ our visitors, we can say with certainty that our user is a person following modern trends in such areas as information security, privacy, etc. That user is concerned about their own privacy, weighing the aspects of their web activity and understanding the consequences and risks of certain actions.”

As well as aiming to appeal to individuals with concerns about their privacy, the search engine is being targeted at parents with concerns about the kind of content their kids might be exposed to online — given it has a built-in filter for violent and pornographic content.

Hulbee is not a startup, having spent 15 years working on semantic search for the b2b space, and selling enterprise-grade search and data analytics to European companies. But it is relatively new to the consumer space — launching a Swiss search engine, called Swisscows.ch, in June 2014 as a first step.

In these post-Snowden tech times, it reckons there’s a fresh opportunity to differentiate on privacy and security grounds vs dominant consumer search players (Google has a circa 90 per cent share of the search market in Europe). And notes, for instance, that its servers are located in Switzerland, so away from the prying eyes of the NSA — or indeed the European Union.

The angel funding will specifically be used to expand its consumer search engine, according to Wiebe. “We have a big mountain to climb with a lot of competitors,” he admits. “[We’ll use the] money to continue to building and develop our search engine for consumers.”

After launching its consumer search engine in the U.S. this summer it added 30 more markets in September, and is now available in 60 countries. It’s not breaking out user data at this stage but says Swisscows.ch is processing more than five million queries per month, while Hulbee.com is processing more than eight million search queries monthly.

The company is also planning to step up its enterprise search activity, with the launch of an enterprise search product specifically targeted at medium and small companies planned for this later month, and an enterprise search engine that aims to compete with Microsoft, Google and HP slated for November.

https://techcrunch.com/2015/10/07/hulbee-angel-round/

Categorized in Search Engine

Calling it an “un-pivot,” Biz Stone is bringing back Jelly, the Q&A app he created in 2013. Launching today, the new and improved Jelly remains close to its roots, but with an added twist. This time, everything is anonymous so you can ask what you really want to know.

Referring to the new Jelly an “on-demand search engine,” Stone said that one lesson he learned from the original Jelly was that people didn’t necessarily want to ask questions to their social network. “Would you want your Googles to be your tweets?”

Some might draw similarities to Quora or Yahoo Answers, but Stone is hoping that this Jelly will be an alternative to Google.

“We think the future of search engines is just ask a question, get the answer,” he added. It’s “ten or 15 minutes you didn’t have to spend looking around on links.”

Users can sign up to answer questions on Jelly. People can rate whether responses were helpful. If someone receives a lot of positive feedback on a certain topic, they are more likely to be selected to answer future similar questions.

The new Jelly is optimized for mobile, but will also be available for desktop searches.

Jelly was founded by both Biz Stone and Ben Finkel in 2013. Backers included Spark Capital, Greylock, Jack Dorsey and Bono.

Says Stone of the change of plans. “We made a rookie mistake. We got talked into pivoting” Jelly into an opinion-sharing app called Super. So the Jelly co-founders decided to go back to “our original dream, our original vision.”

https://techcrunch.com/2016/04/28/twitter-co-founder-biz-stone-relaunches-jelly-search-engine/

Categorized in Search Engine

Bing has long been the butt of jokes, as the Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) search engine is often seen as a second-rate competitor to Google, an Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) subsidiary.

But in Microsoft's latest fiscal year, which ended on June 30, its search advertising business brought in roughly an estimated $5.5 billion in revenue. That's more than major digital advertising platforms such as Twitter or Tencent, although it still pales in comparison with the $52 billion Google brought in from its owned and operated websites last year.

More importantly, Microsoft managed to make Bing profitable in 2016. Bing's transformation from a money pit to a profitable business that's still growing at a formidable pace can help offset some of the revenue losses Microsoft is experiencing from the decline in PC sales.

Can the growth continue?

When Microsoft announced that Bing had turned profitable during its fiscal first quarter, it pointed to the adoption of Windows 10 as a big driver of Bing searches and revenue. Search advertising revenue growth accelerated this year after the release of the new OS. Revenue grew 54% last quarter, compared with 21% in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015.

In the quarterly conference call, Microsoft said more than 40% of June's search revenue came from Windows 10 devices. But Windows 10's free upgrade window will close at the end of the month, which means the adoption rate is sure to slow down over the next year. As such, it's unlikely the boost Bing is experiencing from its prominent position in Windows 10 will last much longer. Microsoft says it currently has 350 million active devices running Windows 10, and it recently walked back its original goal of reaching 1 billion devices by 2018.

Microsoft has also benefited from strategic partnerships such as the one in place with Apple to make Bing the search engine behind the iPhone's digital assistant, Siri. Apple had a huge year of sales last year, but it's now starting to experience a decline in iPhone unit sales. Microsoft also struck a deal with Amazon.com to make Bing the default search engine on its Fire tablets and the search engine behind the popular Alexa smart speaker, which took off last year.

With several major growth drivers in fiscal 2016, Bing had a great year. 2017 will have challenges from the slowdown of Windows 10 and iPhone adoption, as well as the potential for another digital-advertising platform to acquire one of its partners.

Growing profitability

While Microsoft doesn't break out the profitability of Bing, there are reasons to be optimistic that Bing will continue to become more profitable even if growth slows this year.

One important factor is that Microsoft outsourced its display advertising business at the beginning of fiscal 2016. That has allowed the company to focus its sales team on its search advertisements, which generally carry higher prices and margins than display ads. That makes the sales team more cost-efficient for Microsoft to run while it collects high-margin revenue from outsourcing its display ads.

Microsoft is still growing its ad prices, as indicated by the language "higher revenue per search" in its earnings releases. With a continued focus on search ad sales, ad prices should continue to climb. By comparison, Google continues to see its average ad price decline as it gets more traffic from mobile and YouTube TrueView ads. Although that's more than offset by an increase in ad impressions.

While Bing will likely never overtake Google for search supremacy, it has successfully transformed the search engine and advertising business from a joke to a nice profit center for investors. Investors can expect those profits to continue to grow going forward, even if revenue growth faces some challenges.

Growth from Bing is helping to offset the decline in personal-computing revenue, and with signs that the PC market is stabilizing, it could result in incremental net income in the near future.

A secret billion-dollar stock opportunity

The world's biggest tech company forgot to show you something, but a few Wall Street analysts and the Fool didn't miss a beat: There's a small company that's powering their brand-new gadgets and the coming revolution in technology. And we think its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early in-the-know investors! To be one of them, just click here.

Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Adam Levy has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of and recommends GOOG, GOOGL, AMZN, APPL, and TWTR. The Motley Fool owns shares of MSFT and has the following options: long January 2018 $90 calls on AAPL and short January 2018 $95 calls on AAPL. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

http://www.pantagraph.com/business/investment/markets-and-stocks/microsoft-s-bing-bet-is-starting-to-pay-off/article_6568d2ae-502d-53aa-ad71-7b2c617ad5d2.html

Categorized in Search Engine

A picture posted to Imgur Saturday reveals Google’s search engine autocompletes the query “Muslim Dad” with some brutal phrases.

When a user types in “Muslim dad,” the first autocomplete is tame, pulling up searches for “muslim dad dnc.” This refers to the speech a Muslim father gave at the Democratic National Convention in honor of his solider son who died.

The rest of the autocompletes are “muslim dad kills daughters,” “muslim dad kills his daughter,” “muslim dad runs over daughter” and “muslim dad christian mother.”

When a user types in “muslim father,” the auto completes are a little different. The first result is again “muslim father dnc.”

The remaining autocompletes are “muslim father kills daughter,” “muslim father kills gay son,” “muslim fathers and daughters,” “muslim father christian mother.”

http://dailycaller.com/2016/07/31/when-you-type-muslim-dad-in-google-some-pretty-brutal-autocomplete-results-pop-up/

Categorized in Search Engine

ISLAMABAD: In 2013, after Yahoo acquired Tumblr, a micro blogging website, many financial analysts thought that Yahoo would move away from troubled waters and join ranks with the likes of Facebook and Twitter, if not Google.

Marissa Mayer indeed made a good bet by acquiring the blogging platform for $1.1 billion but unfortunately the acquisition failed to turn things around for Yahoo. Revenues fell, though Yahoo snatched back some market share from Google in 2015 after a deal to replace Google as the default search engine on Firefox browsers in the US.

Despite several acquisitions and organisational changes, profits continued to tumble and eventually the company was put up for sale in 2016. Now in hindsight, we can identify four reasons why a company valued at more than $100 billion in year 2000 ended up getting acquired for less than $4 billion in 2016.

Do you Yahoo!?

After 21 years, board of directors at Yahoo still has no idea if Yahoo is an internet technology company or is it a media powerhouse. For most users, Yahoo is an obsolete search engine; for some, Yahoo is synonymous to Yahoo Mail and for many, it is a finance news portal.

The organisational identity crisis resulted in an unbridged gap between its internal self-image and its market positioning. Yahoo was the ‘go-to destination’ to find good content on internet but it failed to develop a new niche after the dot-com bubble burst.

Yahoo is a buzzkill when it comes to acquisitions.

It acquired more than 110 companies since its inception but only a few had a strategic fit with its core business. Yahoo has shown a poor track record in general when it comes to managing million dollar acquisitions. Yahoo failed to monetise the $5.7 billion Broadcast.com, an internet radio company and had to close operations of GeoCities – a web hosting company that it acquired for over $3.6 billion. Yahoo did the same with Delicious and Flickr.

A hands-off approach to product development

Unlike Mark Zuckerberg at Facebook and Larry at Google, co-founders of Yahoo essentially disconnected themselves with decisions related to the product design. Product managers called the shots who would prepare extensive requirements elicitation documents for engineers to execute – with little room for feedback.

Creativity was not a priority and there was no culture of process improvement. Things never changed even when underdogs started to steal Yahoo’s thunder and grab its market share.

Missed opportunities

In 2002, Yahoo failed to close a deal with Google co-founders when they asked for $1 billion. Eventually when Yahoo’s CEO went to them with the reluctant offer, Google raised their valuation to $3 billion.

Similarly in 2006, Yahoo approached Facebook with an offer of $1 billion. Though Mark Zuckerberg declined, it was widely known that an offer of $1.1 billion would have got the deal approved by Facebook’s board.

In 2008, Microsoft approached Yahoo with a takeover bid of over $44 billion. Yang resisted the offer and made up a “stockholder rights plan” as a poison pill to make the company unattractive for takeover. Eventually in 2012, Yang stepped down from the board leaving the company in dire straits.

Final word

An internal memo written by a Yahoo employee in 2006 (called Peanut Butter Manifesto) highlighted that the company wants to do everything and be everything – to everyone. The “fear of missing out” and the inability to focus on a core business contributed to the downfall of an internet pioneer.

http://tribune.com.pk/story/1153035/yahoos-demise-internet-giants-failure-story-missed-opportunities/

Categorized in Search Engine

TinEye and Google Image Search are both good for doing reverse image searches, and the two websites are different enough to be complementary. But there are other options including browser extensions and smartphone apps....

There are lots of reasons for using reverse image search - see my earlier post, Here's why you and your business should use reverse image search - and quite a few ways to do it. The main ones are the TinEye and Google Image Search websites, both of which are free. Depending on your location, needs and personal preferences, you might also want to try Baidu, Yandex, Bing Image Match, Image Raider or some other service.

But if you're new to reverse image searching, I suggest you start with TinEye and Google. I use both, because they are different enough to complement one another. TinEye has better features. Google Image Search generally has a bigger, fresher database, though it doesn't find all the images that TinEye knows about.

Basically, TineEye has the smart guys while Google has the web crawlers.

TinEye wins mainly on sorting features. You can order TinEye's results by newest first or oldest first, by size, by the best match, or by the most changed. I'm often trying to find the oldest version posted, to authenticate a particular photograph.

TinEye's results often show a variety of closely related images, because some versions have been edited or adapted. Sometimes you find your searched-for picture is a small part of a larger image, which is very useful: you can switch to searching for the whole thing. TinEye is also good at finding versions of images that haven't had logos added, which is another step closer to the original.

The main drawback with TinEye is that some of the search results are a couple of years old, and when you follow the link, either the image or the page or even the whole website has disappeared. In such cases, I use the TinEye result to run a Google Image search.

Google Image Search finds web pages rather than images. If you're doing a reverse image search, it's usually more useful to look for the link that says "Find other sizes of this image" and click on "All sizes".

By default, Google displays the most exact matches in descending order of size, and the links to the sources are hidden until you click an image. You can try to make it work more like TinEye by selecting "Visually similar" from the drop-down menu, but this includes images that have nothing at all to do with the original. For most purposes, this is a waste of time.

Worse, Google can't sort images by date. As with text searches, you get options such as "Past week" and "Custom range", but these are tedious to use, and don't seem very reliable.

However, Google does some very good things that TinEye doesn't. The key features are search by type (Face, Photo, Line drawing etc) and search by usage rights. It's very useful to be able to search for images that are "labelled for reuse with modification" or "labelled for non-commercial reuse" or whatever. Handled with care, this could be a money-saver.

With a bit of experiment, some combination of TinEye and Google Image Search should meet most of your needs. If not, there are other options.

I generally use the browser extensions for TinEye and Google. These perform a reverse image search when you right-click an online image and select "search [service] with this image" or something similar. This is quicker than uploading an image from a hard drive or pasting in a web link, though you can do those things too.

Browser extensions include Google's Search by Image for Google (Chrome, Firefox), TinEye Reverse Image Search (Chrome, Firefox, Opera, Safari, Internet Explorer), and Bing Image Match (Chrome). Third-party options include Google Reverse Image Search (Firefox, not written by Google), Search Image by Bing (Firefox, not written by Microsoft) and Who stole my pictures? (Firefox). You may be able to find more. I haven't tried all of them.

Apple iPhone users can do reverse image searches with apps such as Veracity and Microsoft's official Bing app. There's also a Search By Image app for Android. Of course, you can also use Google Image Search in the Chrome browser on a smartphone. Press and hold the image, and when the box appears, touch "Search Google for this image".

Finally, there's a useful image search engine for Reddit, called Karma Decay. If you use Reddit, you will know that some amusing images are reposted on a regular basis. Karma Decay finds them all.

This is more useful than it sounds. Redditors comment on most of these images, and their comments often include links to sources and sometimes explanations. If you are, like me, trying to authenticate images, these links and comments can save quite a lot of work.

http://www.zdnet.com/article/reverse-image-searching-made-easy/

Categorized in Search Engine

Google Search gets a new feature where users will get an alert every time their name is mentioned or appears on the Internet. The feature is called ‘Stay in the Loop,’ through which the search engine giant will notify users on their registered Gmail IDs as to where their names mentioned.

The new feature works as long as a user is logged into his official Google account. Also, they’ve to give Google access to save their Web and App activity which can be enabled via the Activity Controls menu.

“Save your search activity on apps and in browsers to make searches faster and get customized experiences in Search, Maps, Now, and other Google products,” says the Activity Controls page.

How does it work?

To activate the feature, users need to make sure they’re logged into their Google account and have granted Google access to track their Web and App activity. This can be done via the Activity Controls Menu.

Once they’ve granted Google the required access, the Stay in the loop widget shows up at the bottom of the first page of search results. Clicking on the widget takes users to a Google Alert form that already has your username in quotation marks. Once you’ve adjusted the Settings, just click on Create alert, and you’re good to go.

From here on, users can set Google Alerts for their name references. Users can also choose from a number of suggestions to get alerts for such as music, politics, sports and automobiles. Moreover, users can also adjust settings such as email frequency, source types, languages, and region.

Google announced the feature last month in a blog post, though it had not yet been released. Now the search engine giant has officially made the feature live. Along with the ‘Stay in the Loop’ feature, Google has also rolled out several improvements and other features for My Account off-late. The company released the ‘Find your phone’ feature to help users locate their smartphones in case they’re lost or stolen. It also rolled out a new feature where users can access My Account through voice commands.

That being said, several reports suggest that the feature is now live in India. However, I still don’t see the new Stay in the Loop widget that is supposed to appear at the bottom of the first page of search results, even after granting Google access to my Web and App activity via the Activity Controls menu.

Did any of our readers get to see the new Stay in the Loop feature? Do let us know in the comments section below.

http://www.pc-tablet.co.in/google-search-notify-users-metioned-web/38836/

Categorized in Search Engine

Google’s original mobile testing tool came out in 2014, and two years in the land of technology might as well be a lifetime. It was about time they came out with an update, and I’m happy to say it was worth the wait. According to Google, “people are five times more likely to leave a mobile site that isn’t mobile-friendly,” and “nearly half of all visitors will leave a mobile site if the pages don’t load within 3 seconds.” In other, more blatant words, it’s imperative that business owners optimize their sites for mobile.

Read below to find out how to use the newest version of Google’s mobile testing tool and make sure your website is meeting the needs of your mobile customers.

How to Get the New Google Mobile Testing Tool

First things first: you can access the tool from Google’s Search Console’s mobile usability report. Either way, once you’ve arrived at the tool, it’s as simple as entering your website’s URL into the search box, clicking “test now”, and waiting for the results. The home screen will look something like this:

google1

Then, once you enter a URL, your results page will look something like this:

google2

How to Interpret the Google Mobile Testing Tool Results

So now you know how to access the tool (it’s pretty self-explanatory and easy to use, thanks to Google!). Next, you need to know what those results mean. A test is worthless if you can’t use the results to make positive improvements.

In terms of the screenshot above, Google makes it pretty clear that the site is mobile friendly. The big green 99/100 rating for mobile friendliness is a pretty big giveaway. If you’re not looking for an in-depth analysis of your site, this might be just enough information to make you happy and send you on your way. However, you’d be missing out on some of the tool’s (not-so-hidden) features that could help improve your mobile site even more.

You’ll notice in the shot above that next to the mobile friendliness rating are ratings for mobile and desktop speed. Although Express scored high in the overall rating, they didn’t fare so well when it came to speed. This is just one example of the added information you get with the newest version of this tool.

If this was my site and my ratings, the first thing I’d work on fixing would be the speed of my site on both mobile and desktop.

One of the big differences between the old version of the tool and the updated version is that you now have access to this added information; in the past, all the tool said was whether or not your site was mobile friendly. Now, users have much more detailed information in the form of a 0-100-scale rating that discusses mobile friendliness, but also mobile and desktop speed.

Additional Features of the Google Mobile Testing Tool

Besides the new rating scale and the fact that you can get all three scores on one screen, Google has made another big change; they give you the option to have a comprehensive report sent to you that you can share with your team. If you click that button, a screen will appear that looks something like this:

google3

Google is nice enough to give you some mobile tips in an easy-to-read, easy-to-understand format even before receiving your free report (which they promise will arrive within 24 hours). Here is a report that I had sent to me for amandadisilvestro.com:

Screen Shot 2016-07-24 at 4.46.11 PM

 

mobile tool

You can see that in the area where I scored poorly (mobile speed), Google tells me exactly what needs to be fixed. They even provide links that lead to technical support in case the team needs help fixing the problem. They’re pretty much taking the guesswork out of the whole thing, so truly optimizing a mobile site has never been this painless.

Possible Critiques of the Google Mobile Testing Tool

I do think it is interesting, and worth noting, that while there is a ton of information out there about how the tool works and how to use it, there isn’t a lot of information that explains the algorithm the tool uses in order to determine the three different ratings. All I was really able to determine was that it looks at things like CSS, HTML, scripts, and images and then evaluates how quickly (or slowly) it takes for your website to load.

So how do they determine where your site falls on the rating scale? Perhaps by how long it takes for your site to load past the 3-second mark, which they claim is the attention span people have for waiting on mobile sites. (Ironically enough, it takes longer than three seconds for Google’s site to complete its test.)

I became even more skeptical after coming across this article by Search Engine Watch. They did some more extensive tests and found that their site, along with Forbes, and many other sites, all received “poor” ratings for both mobile and desktop speed. In fact, the only site they could find that received good scores in all three categories was Google. When I did the test myself, I received the same results, as you can see below:

Screen Shot 2016-07-24 at 4.50.21 PM

I hate to be a skeptic and go around touting a conspiracy theory, but what’s up with that Google? Are all the other mobile sites out there really inferior to yours, or are you just trying to drum up business for your new tool?

Regardless of the critiques or potential fishy-ness happening, the tool is easy to use and is something I would recommend. After all, it’s free, and if you truly don’t believe what you see, then you don’t have to make any changes. If nothing else, it gets you thinking.

What do you think of Google’s new tool? Was your site able to score a “good” in more than one category? Comment in the section below and let us know what you think.

https://www.searchenginejournal.com/dont-miss-use-googles-new-mobile-testing-tool/168899/

Categorized in Search Engine

The MEHR News Agency reports that the Iranian Minister of IT, Mahmoud Vaezi, has stated an agreement has been signed with Russia for the development of an Iranian National Remote-Sensing Satellite.

Vaezi was in a tour of Moscow to discuss technical cooperation with Russia. Upon returning to Tehran, he told reporters that among his visit’s achievement was an initial agreement with Russian to work with Iranian industries to build the remote-sensing satellite, under the title of National Remote-Sensing Satellite. He reportedly stated that the project is very critical, and the prediction is that the satellite build will require two years of work.

On the Russian search engine Yandex, Vaezi added that Iran welcomes foreign investments. He indicated that the Russians have requested that their search engine be active in Iran and that the engine will have no limits as to content—the engine will start operation in Iran after preliminary work and some technical issues are ironed out. The Minister stated the he believes all search engines should compete for public markets and that people should be free choose from among them for their search needs.

http://satnews.com/story.php?number=1929553472&menu=1

Categorized in Others

Search giant Google has added a new feature on its Google Search where users would be notified with an alert every time their name is noted or seems on the Internet. The feature is said to be “Stay in the Loop” from which the users would get their names appeared on their Gmail IDs by the Google.

The new feature runs as long as a user stays connected with their official Google account. Also, they have to offer Google access to store their Web and App activity which can be activated through the Activity Controls menu.

The Activity Controls menu said, “Save your search activity on apps and in browsers to make searches faster and get customized experiences in Search, Maps, Now, and other Google products.”

To enable this feature, users have to make sure that they are logged into their registered Gmail account and have given all permission to Google to track their Web and App activity. This can be activated through the Activity Controls menu.

Once they have given all needed access to Google, the Stay in the loop widget adds at the bottom of the first page of the search results. Tapping on the widget moves users to a Google Alert form that already consist of username in quotation marks. Once they have managed the Settings, just tap on Create alert, and the user would be all set to get the alert.

From here on, users can adjust Google Alerts for their name references. Users can also have access to select from a number of suggestions to obtain alerts for like politics, music, sports, and automobiles. In addition to this, they can also manage settings like source types, languages, frequency, and region.

Google declared the feature in the previous month in a blog post, though it had not yet been updated. Now the search engine has officially brought the feature live to the users. Along with this feature, Google has also unveiled several changes and other features for My Account off-late. The company launched the ‘Find your Phone’ feature to allow users locate their smart devices in cases they are stolen or lost. It also brought a new feature where subscribers can use My Account through voice commands.

According to several reports, the feature is now made live in India too. But, The ‘Stay in the Loop’ doesn’t seem to locate at the bottom of the first page of search results yet, even after giving Google access to my Web and App activity through the Activity Controls menu.

http://tecake.in/news/tech/google-search-acquires-new-feature-stay-loop-notify-users-whenever-appeared-web-21403.html

Categorized in Search Engine

airs logo

Association of Internet Research Specialists is the world's leading community for the Internet Research Specialist and provide a Unified Platform that delivers, Education, Training and Certification for Online Research.

Get Exclusive Research Tips in Your Inbox

Receive Great tips via email, enter your email to Subscribe.

Follow Us on Social Media